Investing

The Best AI Stocks Are Falling for the Wrong Reason

Last week, Big Tech reset the scoreboard for the 2026 fiscal year. 

Collectively, the “Hyperscale Five” – Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), and Oracle (ORCL) – revealed they are on track to spend over $700 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026. To put that in perspective, that is nearly $2 billion every single day being poured into silicon, steel, and power.

Predictably, Wall Street is having a panic attack. Investors are looking at these massive checks and asking, “Where is the ROI?” They fear we are at “Peak Capex,” and that once this 2026 build-out is complete, the orders for AI supply chain stocks will vanish into a decade-long “digestion” period.

So, naturally, AI stocks are crashing. 

But I’m here to tell you that the bears are wrong – because they’re misunderstanding where AI spending is actually headed.

What’s happening right now isn’t a temporary construction binge. It’s a fundamental shift in how AI compute gets consumed across the economy.

We believe this $700 billion-plus in AI capex will prove to be a floor, not a peak, for annual spending – because AI compute is shifting from something companies build once to something they consume forever.

We’re entering what I call the Inference Inversion.

AI Capex Is Shifting From Training to Inference

The biggest misunderstanding in the market today is the difference between AI training and inference.

For the last two years, the bull market was driven by training as companies spent billions to build AI’s “brain.” Bears seem to believe that once the models are trained, the spending stops. But the data from this February 2026 earnings season shows the opposite: Inference compute volume has officially exceeded training compute.

  • Training is a CapEx event: You build it, and you’re done for a while.
  • Inference is an OpEx utility: It scales linearly with every single user.

In other words, training creates one-time demand. Inference creates recurring demand.

And Wall Street consistently underestimates businesses that turn capital spending into ongoing utilities.

As more advanced “reasoning” models become the standard, they rely on something called test-time scaling – meaning the model deliberately runs more compute per query to arrive at better answers.

That’s crucial: unlike training, this compute load never shuts off. Every additional user, prompt, and interaction permanently increases infrastructure demand. Test-time scaling turns AI from a bursty workload into a 24/7 industrial process.

Inferencing is the real deal. And while it shows up as ongoing operating demand, it forces continuous capital investment to keep up.

Why AI Hardware Upgrade Cycles Are Accelerating

In AI, falling one hardware generation behind isn’t a nuisance; it’s an existential risk.

Pre-AI, data centers upgraded servers about every five years. But that cycle timeline has collapsed to 12 months.

AI hardware is no longer improving incrementally. It’s improving exponentially – and that has broken the old data-center upgrade cycle.

Nvidia‘s (NVDA) roadmap – moving from Hopper to Blackwell and now to the Vera Rubin architecture – has forced a “death march” on the hyperscalers.

The Rubin GPU (shipping late 2026) promises a 10x reduction in token cost. If Google moves its stack to Rubin and cuts its AI operating costs by 90%, Microsoft and Amazon have no choice but to follow – or risk being structurally uncompetitive on price, margins, and latency.

Source link

Share with your friends!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get The Latest Investing Tips
Straight to your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.